Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/30/1994 01:41 PM Senate HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CHAIRMAN RIEGER introduced SB 231 (PAY PHYSICIAN ASSTS UNDER MEDICAID) as the last order of business before the committee. CAROL CARROL, Staff to Senator Kerttula, explained that SB 231 would add physician assistants to the optional services reimbursed under Medicaid. She discussed the current problems regarding billing and physician assistants. Medicaid requires that the physician must see each patient billed under their number at least once. SB 231 would allow physician assistants to bill Medicaid for services they provided to patients in their local areas. She noted the presence of a fiscal note from DHSS. CHAIRMAN RIEGER said that he intended to have SB 231 at the same time as a bill regarding Medicaid in Senate Finance where the fiscal note could be addressed. He said that he would hear testimony on the fiscal note if anyone wished to testify. SENATOR SALO stated that the fiscal note seemed inflated and would be best handled in Senate Finance. SENATOR SHARP inquired as to the numbering of the list on page 2 of SB 231. CAROL CARROL explained that as funds run short, numbers 1- 4 would be removed. From numbers 5 and up, the groups become a higher priority when removing money from Medicaid. CHAIRMAN RIEGER agreed with Senator Sharp that there seemed to be a drafting error in the numbering. Number 140 SENATOR LEMAN stated that the situation which brought this problem to Senator Kerttula's attention had been resolved due to designating the entity as a rural health clinic. He asked if adoption of SB 231 would create disparities in billing for Medicaid services and other billings by physician assistants who have to use the collaborating doctor's number for all other billings. CAROL CARROL clarified that a physician assistant in a physician's office on location bills under the physician's number. SB 231 addresses a physician assistant collaborating with a physician at a remote location where the physician does not see every Medicaid patient. The physician assistant cannot bill Medicaid for those services because the collaborating physician does not see the patient at a remote site. She concluded that SB 231 deals with physician assistants at remote sites, but it would allow a physician assistant to set up their own site with a collaborating physician and see patients. She said that most physician assistants currently, are located in a physician's office in their location. JOHN RILEY, Alaska Academy of Physician Assistants, reiterated that the primary purpose of SB 231 was to allow reimbursement of physician assistants working in remote sites. He noted that previously, physician assistants billed through their collaborating physician's Medicaid number or through a clinic's Medicaid number, in certain designated rural health clinics. He acknowledged that there are some physician assistants in remote areas who do bill under their physician's number although the physician is not on site, which DHSS says is not allowable. In communities where a physician assistant is the only health care provider, this issue would be a clear barrier to care for Medicaid recipients. He informed the committee of an October 1993 study that found that about half of the physician assistants are located in rural areas outside of Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau. Mr. Riley stated that the fiscal note seems higher than it should be. The fiscal note would be more accurate if it represented a parallel number to the fees generated for Medicaid by currently practicing nurses practitioners. This is a $200,000 cost to the state. He assumed that the reimbursement rate for physician assistants would be similar to that of nurse practitioners, 80 percent. That would result in a decreased billing rate to Medicaid which would lead to cost shifting. Number 249 WENDY HLADICK, Physician Assistant and Registered Nurse in Galena, said that she was speaking for the rural areas of Galena, Telkeetna, Healey, McGrath, Pelican, Skagway, and Seward. She informed the committee that non-physician providers, physician assistants and nurse practitioners, are able to diagnosis and treat 80 percent of their patient's problems. She stated that non- physician providers are less expensive to train than physicians and have a proven track record comparable to physicians. SB 231 would remove some of the inequalities in practice between nurse practitioners and physician assistants. She did not believe that current regulations adequately or fairly reimburse physician assistants. SB 231 would help educate insurance companies of physician assistants. Physician assistants offer affordable, quality health care. She said that passage of SB 231 would recognize physician assistants as health care providers worthy of reimbursement just as nurse practitioners, and recognize the need for uniform percentile reimbursement by all insurance carriers for physician assistants. SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt Senator Kerttula's amendment which adds physician assistants to the list of non-discriminatory groups. AMENDMENT Page 1, line 1, after " Act ": Insert " relating to physician assistants " Page 1, line 4, after " Section 1. ": Insert new material to read: "AS 21,36.090(d) is amended to read: (d) Except to the extent necessary to comply with AS 21.42.365 and AS 21.56, a person may not practice or permit unfair discrimination against a person who provides a service covered under a group disability policy that extends coverage on an expense incurred basis, or under a group service or indemnity type contract issued by a nonprofit corporation, if the service is within the scope of the provider's occupational license. In this subsection, "provider" means a state licensed physician, physician assistant, dentist, osteopath, optometrist, chiropractor, nurse midwife, advanced nurse practitioner, naturopath, physical therapist, occupational therapist, psychologist, psychological associate, [OR] licensed clinical social worker, or certified direct-entry midwife. *Sec. 2. AS 23,30.265(24) is amended to read: (24) "physician" includes doctors of medicine, surgeons, physician assistants, chiropractors, osteopaths, dentists, and optometrists; *Sec. 3. " CHAIRMAN RIEGER objected. He explained that there was a similar bill, Family & Marital Therapist, in the Labor & Commerce committee which had not moved. He preferred that this amendment be offered in Finance in order to have Senator Kerttula, the prime sponsor, as well as Senator Kelly, the chairman of Labor & Commerce, would be present to discuss their views. Chairman Rieger stated that he tended to support the amendment. SENATOR SALO believed that the amendment did not move out of Labor & Commerce because another amendment was offered adding acupuncturists. That seemed to complicate the issue. CHAIRMAN RIEGER removed his objection. CAROL CARROL stated that this allows physician assistants to be covered under workman's compensation for any services they fund or under third party payers insurance companies. Hearing no objection, the amendment was adopted. SENATOR ELLIS moved SB 231 out of committee with individual recommendations. Hearing no objections, it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|